Comments for Andrew Peters' Blog http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com C# & .NET Development, Patterns, Agile, Ruby, MonoRail, Design, Rails Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:48:40 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on PowerShell Gadget by tv brackets http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-410 tv brackets Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:48:40 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-410 Can this gadget be used for classic minigames? Can this gadget be used for classic minigames?

]]> Comment on Blog Moved by aplink http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/blog-moved/#comment-149 aplink Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:01:28 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/blog-moved/#comment-149 hay mate, my name is also Andrew Peters, Where RU, my blog is : http://aplink.wordpress.com cheers hay mate, my name is also Andrew Peters, Where RU, my blog is :
http://aplink.wordpress.com

cheers

]]> Comment on PowerShell Gadget by Andrew Peters’ Blog » Blog Archive » Using .NET Components from Vista Sidebar Gadgets http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-146 Andrew Peters’ Blog » Blog Archive » Using .NET Components from Vista Sidebar Gadgets Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:19:56 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-146 [...] when developing a non-trivial gadget, you need the full power of good old .NET. Fear not, with just a little bit of tasty COM [...] [...] when developing a non-trivial gadget, you need the full power of good old .NET. Fear not, with just a little bit of tasty COM [...]

]]> Comment on Using .NET Components from Vista Sidebar Gadgets by James B http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/using-net-components-from-vista-sidebar-gadgets/#comment-145 James B Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:50:05 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/using-net-components-from-vista-sidebar-gadgets/#comment-145 That's nice, but you don't actually need to REGISTER the object. (and I'm betting a lot of sys admins would be happy if you don't) http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/dsandor/ActiveXInNet11102005040748AM/ActiveXInNet.aspx Illustrates how to host your object without registering the DLL. That’s nice, but you don’t actually need to REGISTER the object.

(and I’m betting a lot of sys admins would be happy if you don’t)

http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/dsandor/ActiveXInNet11102005040748AM/ActiveXInNet.aspx

Illustrates how to host your object without registering the DLL.

]]> Comment on PowerShell Gadget by kfarmer http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-143 kfarmer Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:03:16 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-143 Again, very nifty. But I'm thinking -- generalize it into a console application hoster. Then in the options, you can specify the app to be hosted (powershell, ironpython, cmd, etc), and whether the flyout shows up automatically when the control has focus. Maybe pick up the exe's icon and use that in the UI. Personally, I think you've already done all the hard work. :) Again, very nifty. But I’m thinking — generalize it into a console application hoster. Then in the options, you can specify the app to be hosted (powershell, ironpython, cmd, etc), and whether the flyout shows up automatically when the control has focus. Maybe pick up the exe’s icon and use that in the UI.

Personally, I think you’ve already done all the hard work. :)

]]> Comment on PowerShell Gadget by Using .NET Components from Vista Sidebar Gadgets « Andrew Peters’ Blog http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-134 Using .NET Components from Vista Sidebar Gadgets « Andrew Peters’ Blog Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:25:01 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/04/04/powershell-gadget/#comment-134 [...] .NET Components from Vista Sidebar Gadgets Sometimes, when developing a non-trivial gadget, you need the full power of good old .NET. Fear not, with just a little bit of tasty COM [...] [...] .NET Components from Vista Sidebar Gadgets Sometimes, when developing a non-trivial gadget, you need the full power of good old .NET. Fear not, with just a little bit of tasty COM [...]

]]> Comment on ASP.NET vs. MonoRail by andrewpeters http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/aspnet-vs-monorail/#comment-110 andrewpeters Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:05:03 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/aspnet-vs-monorail/#comment-110 No problem :-) No problem :-)

]]> Comment on ASP.NET vs. MonoRail by Borek http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/aspnet-vs-monorail/#comment-108 Borek Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:23:50 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/aspnet-vs-monorail/#comment-108 Very nice article, one of the best on the topic. Thank you. Very nice article, one of the best on the topic. Thank you.

]]> Comment on Jolt Nominees 2007 by Josh http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/jolt-nominees-2007/#comment-99 Josh Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:56:44 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/jolt-nominees-2007/#comment-99 I think Build Tools should get their own category, so make that list even longer next year. ;-) I was just happy to see AccuRev recapture the Jolt Award for SCM. It will be hard for any file-based branch and label SCM tool to catch the innovation capabilities of its stream-based model and all that jazz. I think Build Tools should get their own category, so make that list even longer next year. ;-) I was just happy to see AccuRev recapture the Jolt Award for SCM. It will be hard for any file-based branch and label SCM tool to catch the innovation capabilities of its stream-based model and all that jazz.

]]> Comment on How to determine whether a type is an instance of some generic type without knowing T? by andrewpeters http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/how-to-determine-whether-a-type-is-an-instance-of-some-generic-type-without-knowing-t/#comment-98 andrewpeters Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:14:07 +0000 http://andrewpeters.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/how-to-determine-whether-a-type-is-an-instance-of-some-generic-type-without-knowing-t/#comment-98 Ah, that would be because System.Nullable isn't nullable :-) Ah, that would be because System.Nullable isn’t nullable :-)

]]>